Rahman Ravelli

Crypto Assets and Cryptocurrency

Overview

Rahman Ravelli is one of the world’s most respected, go-to firms for high-value crypto-related matters. A precedent-setting market leader, it has a track record of success in the most complex cases and has secured outcomes that helped define the law.

Its achievements in this area are due to its creative, entrepreneurial approach to litigation – an approach that has seen it secure a series of landmark judgements. Rahman Ravelli acts for clients at all stages of a dispute or crisis, where securing urgent interim relief, managing regulatory risk or recovering misappropriated assets is the priority.

The firm works strategically with speed and discretion, operating a recovery-first strategy that uses all relevant legislation to give clients the strongest possibility of securing the outcome they want to achieve. All of its respected team of lawyers work across multiple jurisdictions and are experts at working with foreign counsel, exchanges and forensic blockchain experts.

Our approach is proactive and focused on achieving rapid enforceable outcomes rather than on drawn-out litigation.

Some of our leading cases include:

  • AA v Persons Unknown, the first English case to recognise crypto as property.
  • Ion Science v Persons Unknown, which established the jurisdictional gateway for crypto-related disclosure orders.
  • LMN v Bitflyer, where information-related orders were obtained against numerous overseas exchanges.
  • Fetch ai v Persons Unknown, involving the first crypto-related pump and dump scheme to be brought before the commercial court.
  • Being UK counsel to Terraform Labs in relation to the largest-ever United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) crypto investigation, concerning alleged losses of approximately $40 billion to the US economy.

How We Help

Our work spans the full spectrum of crypto-related legal issues, including:

1. Dispute resolution

We secure urgent interim relief though freezing orders, disclosure orders and other interim measures to prevent the dissipation of assets and support enforcement action.

2. Asset tracing and recovery

Working alongside experts and investigators, we trace and recover digital assets across jurisdictions, ensuring our clients have the best possible strategy for reclaiming losses.

3. Regulatory, compliance and risk advice

Advising crypto-asset service providers, exchanges, funds and institutional investors on compliance, risk and sanctions compliance.

4. Crisis management and defence

Providing legal structure and strategic advice designed to protect reputation and limit exposure.

Who Our Services Are For

Rahman Ravelli’s crypto practice supports a broad range of clients including:

  • Blockchain companies.
  • Exchanges and trading platforms.
  • Developers.
  • Blockchain and Web3 businesses.
  • Investment funds and major institutional investors.
  • High net worth individuals and ultra-high net worth individuals.

We work across multiple jurisdictions and frequently collaborate with foreign counsel, regulators and technical specialists to deliver coordinated global solutions.

Our lawyers are known for their robust, intelligent and relentless efforts to pursue clients’ interests. They make the all-important decisions early and act on them immediately to achieve a swift outcome rather than lengthy litigation. This is why we are entrusted with the largest, most challenging cross-border crypto disputes and asset recovery cases.

Why Choose Us?

We were among the earliest firms to build deep expertise in the crypto disputes sector and have developed with the market.

We have represented and / or advised:

  • Multinational regulated businesses on issues surrounding securities.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) laboratories that are focused on building machine learning platforms based on the blockchain and distributed ledger.
  • Utility tokens in the form of crypto assets that are trading in global markets.
  • Cryptocurrency exchanges seeking advice on sanctions compliance and asset recovery.
  • Global non-fungible token marketplaces that require regulatory, anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance advice.

The firm helped found CFAAR (the Crypto Fraud and Asset Recovery network), a global organisation of legal professionals that aims to bring together the leading names in crypto dispute resolution. Syed Rahman, who leads the firm’s crypto practice, is also Head of International Chapters at CFAAR.

Having been working with the crypto industry since 2016, the firm’s extensive experience means its lawyers are regularly asked to write for major publications and speak at international conferences and events on crypto-related legal matters.

Experience

As one of the first legal practices to recognise the potential legal and financial implications of crypto, Rahman Ravelli is an elite firm at the cutting edge of such matters.

The international reach and depth of experience of our multinational team ensure that clients’ interests are aggressively and effectively enforced. Its combination of speed, intelligence and creativity obtains results that other firms cannot achieve.

Rahman Ravelli is one of the very few firms that has matured and developed in tandem with the crypto sector; enabling it to stay ahead of competitors, keep pace with all relevant matters and possess a track record of success in landmark cases. It has repeatedly proved itself to be the logical destination for those needing representation to resolve the most demanding legal and business problems relating to digital assets and emerging technology; from disputes and all related litigation through to fraud, tracing, freezing, enforcement and recovery.

Rahman Ravelli’s experience means it is adept at obtaining the most appropriate remedy in every case.

These remedies include:

  • Disclosure orders against exchanges, banks and other third parties who hold information.
  • Search orders to allow premises to be entered to search and remove any documents and material described by the order.
  • Freezing orders and worldwide freezing orders (including orders against persons unknown where the perpetrator of a fraud has not been identified) so that defendants cannot diminish the value of the assets or dissipate them before any judgement is made.
  • Without notice applications, which involve applying to a court for a disclosure, search or freezing order in secret, so the person accused of wrongdoing is unaware of what is happening thus reducing the risk of them dissipating the assets.
  • Chabra orders, which are sought when a third party holds the assets in question.
  • Norwich Pharmacal orders, which enable the victim of the alleged wrongdoing to obtain information that will enable them to bring legal action against the alleged wrongdoer.
  • Receivership orders, so a receiver can be appointed before any court judgement is made in order to preserve assets until judgment is made.

Key Sector Trends

The crypto sector and the disputes arising from it have changed significantly in recent years.

There has been a growth in large-scale fraud and major exchange-level disputes. In response, the courts have shown an increased willingness to grant urgent interim relief.

In addition, there has been a rise in jurisdictional arbitrage, which is the practice of exploiting the differences between various countries’ legal, regulatory or tax regimes in order to obtain the most favourable outcome possible. This has been accompanied by an increase in forum shopping, where a legal action is filed in a particular jurisdiction to obtain such an outcome.

Such tactics can bring challenges when it comes to both mounting a case and enforcing the resulting judgement. Which is why it is important to seek legal representation that can effectively address - or even anticipate - each and every factor that may arise in a case.

Representative Matters

Rahman Ravelli represents clients in all aspects of crypto disputes, including those seeking relief and those facing allegations of fraud or regulatory breaches. This gives us a dual perspective that enhances our strategic approach in complex matters.

As pioneers in the field, Rahman Ravelli is one of the most influential law firms in this practice area, with a track record of success in leading cases. The firm was UK counsel to Terraform Labs, the company at the centre of one of the largest-ever digital asset disputes; where the SEC alleged that a fraudulent scheme caused losses of $40 billion to the U.S. economy.

View Experience

Rahman Ravelli has helped clients navigate the complex legal landscape not only in the UK but also in the EU, US and Internationally. Some of our case work, listed below demonstrates our expertise and experience.

  • ACTED as UK defence counsel for a Singapore-based cryptocurrency company in landmark US SEC enforcement proceedings concerning an alleged $40 billion cryptocurrency fraud—the SEC’s most high-profile case in the digital assets sector to date.
  • REPRESENTING an international stablecoin issuer in a complex global asset recovery effort arising from the alleged misappropriation of US $456 million in reserve assets routed through Dubai, Hong Kong, the US, offshore jurisdictions and the UK.
  • DEFENCE of an international private client in the landmark case AA v Persons Unknown. This was the first case where a high court judge recognised cryptocurrency as “property”.
  • REPRESENTATION of an artificial intelligence lab in the landmark case of Fetch AI v Persons Unknown. This case is widely recognised as it involved the successful obtaining of a worldwide freezing order after the applicant suffered a loss of $2.6 million when unidentified bad actors gained access to cryptocurrency accounts.
  • REPRESENTATION of a global technology company and its employees in connection with an investigation into online deceptive commercial practices, brought by the French regulator for fair competition and consumer rights (DGCCRF).
  • REPRESENTED a corporate entity in the landmark case of Ion Science v Persons Unknown. This case is widely recognised as the first ICO fraud case to go before the commercial court, and the first time a court considered the location of Bitcoin for jurisdictional purposes. An injunction was obtained to freeze crypto assets.
  • REPRESENTED a major US corporation in a transatlantic investigation into a sophisticated hack and theft of crypto assets. This involved working closely with the FBI in the US and the UK National Crime Agency’s cybercrime department.
  • REPRESENTED an English cryptocurrency exchange that was subject to a sophisticated hack, leading to investigations in nations including the Seychelles, Belarus and Ukraine.
  • ACTING as ongoing regulatory counsel to a market-leading, multinational business operating at the forefront of the crypto asset industry, with a particular focus on Non Fungible Tokens (NFT’s).
  • REPRESENTED one of Europe’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges in LMN v Bitflyer, a landmark $10.7 million crypto fraud case which established the first successful use of the new ‘disclosure gateway’, setting a key precedent for asset tracing in crypto fraud cases.
  • REPRESENTING victims of cryptocurrency fraud who lost £1.1 million.
  • ACTING for a global aviation client in cyber breach litigation involving high-profile data; securing injunctions, summary judgment and anonymity orders.
  • REPRESENTING a multinational technology company operating in the burgeoning decentralised media streaming sector.
  • DEFENDING a leading global cryptocurrency exchange in high-value, fast-moving proceedings arising from an alleged crypto investment fraud.
  • DEFENDING a client in a high-value, multi-jurisdictional dispute relating to substantial crypto assets and ownership of a prestigious UK property, following the death of a member of a foreign royal family.
  • ADVISED a multinational cryptocurrency and non-fungible token (NFT) art dealer on compliance with UK and US money laundering and sanctions law.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the legal status of cryptocurrency in the UK?

Cryptocurrency is recognised as property under English law following the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce's Legal Statement on Cryptoassets and Smart Contracts (2019) and subsequent case law (notably AA v Persons Unknown [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm)). This means that crypto assets can be the subject of proprietary claims, freezing orders, and recovery proceedings. The FCA regulates certain cryptoasset activities under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, and is expanding its remit under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.

What types of crypto-related fraud are commonly investigated?

Common types of crypto-related fraud include: investment fraud involving unregistered or fraudulent crypto exchanges or fund schemes; rug pulls (where developers abandon a project and abscond with investor funds); pump-and-dump schemes involving manipulation of crypto asset prices; NFT fraud and market manipulation; initial coin offering (ICO) fraud; and theft from exchanges and wallets through hacking. The National Crime Agency and City of London Police are among the UK agencies most active in investigating crypto fraud.

Can stolen cryptocurrency be recovered?

Yes. English courts have demonstrated a willingness to grant freezing orders and other interim relief in respect of stolen cryptocurrency and have ordered exchanges to provide information about wallet holders through Norwich Pharmacal orders. Blockchain analysis firms can trace the movement of stolen crypto assets through the blockchain with a high degree of accuracy, and this forensic trail can support both civil recovery claims and criminal proceedings. The ability to trace and recover stolen crypto is improving as regulatory frameworks around exchanges tighten.

What is money laundering through cryptocurrency and how is it investigated?

Cryptocurrency can be used to launder the proceeds of crime by converting fiat currency into crypto, moving it through multiple wallets and exchanges (sometimes using 'mixing' services designed to obfuscate the trail), and then converting back to fiat currency. Law enforcement agencies use blockchain analytics tools to trace these movements. The POCA money laundering offences apply to crypto assets in the same way as to other property, and HMRC and the NCA have taken action against individuals and exchanges facilitating crypto-based money laundering.

What are the FCA's requirements for cryptoasset businesses?

Cryptoasset exchange providers and custodian wallet providers operating in the UK must be registered with the FCA under the Money Laundering Regulations. The FCA has also designated certain cryptoassets as specified investments or regulated financial instruments requiring full authorisation. Businesses must comply with AML obligations including customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting. The regulatory framework is expanding: the UK government is implementing a comprehensive crypto regulatory regime, and the FCA has been consulting on rules covering stablecoins, staking, and a broader range of crypto activities.

What are the tax obligations of cryptocurrency holders in the UK?

HMRC treats cryptocurrency as a capital asset for tax purposes. Disposals — including sales, exchanges for other crypto, gifts, and use of crypto to pay for goods or services — are subject to Capital Gains Tax (CGT) for individuals. Income received in cryptocurrency — for example, mining rewards and certain staking returns — may be subject to Income Tax. HMRC has published detailed guidance on crypto taxation and has obtained data from exchanges to identify and pursue individuals who have not declared crypto gains. Failure to report is treated as a serious compliance failure.

How does English law treat NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens)?

NFTs are a category of cryptoasset that represent ownership of a unique digital item. English law treats NFTs as property — they can be owned, transferred, and are subject to the same proprietary legal principles as other crypto assets. The legal questions most commonly arising in relation to NFTs include: what intellectual property rights, if any, attach to the underlying asset; whether the NFT constitutes a financial instrument subject to FCA regulation; and how fraud and theft involving NFTs should be addressed. The legal framework for NFTs is continuing to develop rapidly through court decisions and regulatory guidance.

Why do cryptocurrency investigations and disputes require specialist legal advice?

The legal and regulatory landscape for cryptoassets is evolving rapidly and requires solicitors who combine deep knowledge of financial regulation and criminal law with an understanding of the technical features of blockchain and distributed ledger technology. The cross-border nature of most crypto activity adds further complexity. Specialist crypto solicitors can advise on regulatory compliance, respond to FCA investigations, pursue civil recovery claims, and represent clients in criminal proceedings.

Specialist Team

Awards & Honours

Subscribe To Our Crypto-Tracker

Subscribe to the Crypto Tracker today for free and start to learn about the trends and the legal developments in this fast-moving sector. We will send you emails (not too many) as part of your subscription. By subscribing you are agreeing that you're happy to receive emails from Rahman Ravelli. You can unsubscribe at any time.

* indicates required

Privacy Policy.