Rahman Ravelli
Rahman Ravelli Solicitors Logo
Switchboard: +44 (0)203 947 1539

About Us Expertise PEOPLE International Legal Articles News Events Contact Us toggle button for phone toggle button for search

What small and medium-sized businesses must know about the Bribery Act

Author: Azizur Rahman  20 October 2015
3 min read

The UK government found out, via a survey it carried out, that one-third of UK SME’s (small and medium-sized enterprises) had not heard of the Bribery Act five years after it had come onto the statute books. This is despite the Ministry of Justice having issued guidance specifically to help SME's comply with the Act.

The Scope of the Bribery Act

The lack of awareness highlighted by the survey was worrying, as the Act is a wide-ranging piece of legislation that carries heavy penalties.

The Act:

  • covers the activities of all companies that are based in the UK, have premises or staff here or any other "close connection" to the UK. 
  • allows for such companies to be prosecuted in the UK for bribery that took place on their behalf or in their name anywhere in the world. These prosecutions can be brought against a company if the bribery was carried out by one of its staff or even an intermediary, third party or trading partner acting for it.

It goes without saying that ignorance of the law is no defence, which is why the survey's findings were so worrying. But it is also worth emphasising that a company will not escape prosecution under the Act if it says, or even if it can prove, that it was unaware of the bribery. 

This is because, under the Act, companies have to be able to show they had adequate procedures in place to identify and prevent any potential for bribery.

The Need for Compliance

With the Act including provisions allowing for unlimited fines and up to ten years imprisonment, all companies must make sure they are fully engaged in complying with it.

But what does this involve? Putting it simply, companies have to make sure they are fully aware and informed of the bribery risks that exist in the business sectors and geographical locations in which they do business.

They have to assess the risk as it applies to their staff, business associates, intermediaries, third parties and potential or existing trading partners. In short, anyone with any association with the company.

The Definition of Bribery

Under the Act, bribery is defined as the giving or receiving of a financial or other advantage in connection with the "improper performance" of a position of trust, or a function that is expected to be performed impartially or in good faith. Bribery does not have to involve cash or an actual payment exchanging hands and can take many forms such as a gift. It could be bribery to retain or secure a contract or order, to gain an advantage over a competitor or to ensure a "blind eye" is turned to something unsatisfactory.

The Value of Risk Prevention

Any risk assessment carried out will count for nothing — and most likely fail to prevent the aforementioned situations — if it is not followed up with the introduction of company training to remove and prevent the risk of bribery.

Such training cannot just be a one-off exercise to "tick boxes". It has to be thorough, ongoing, regularly monitored and reviewed and clearly communicated to all staff. Crucially, it has to be seen to be part of a commitment from the highest levels of the company to prevent or eradicate bribery.

Similarly, carrying out due diligence on present and potential trading partners and associates has to be thorough and ongoing; reflecting an awareness of the need to exercise caution in proportion to the risk involved. The number of prosecutions has not been huge in the first years of the Bribery Act. But this must not be taken as a reason to be complacent.

Bribery is increasingly on the radar of the authorities both here and abroad, hence the major fines being imposed on many major companies for their activities in various parts of the world. Small and medium-sized businesses should not leave anything to chance in the hope that their failings regarding bribery are not detected. The scope of the Act makes it possible for companies to be prosecuted for what they may regard as merely maintaining a business relationship rather than obtaining a specific reward.

With s7 of the Act having created the offence of failing to prevent bribery, a huge burden of proof is placed on companies to show that they have adequate anti-corruption procedures in place. If they are unsure how to assess the risk of bribery or how to devise and introduce training to prevent it happening, there are legal experts who can help companies of all sizes identify and eradicate the potential for bribery.

Such expertise will cost significantly less than the price a company will have to pay if it falls foul of the Act.

Azizur Rahman C 09369

Azizur Rahman

Senior Partner

+44 (0)203 911 9339 vCard

Download Profile PDF

View Profile

Aziz Rahman is Senior Partner at Rahman Ravelli and its founder. His ability to coordinate national, international and multi-agency defences has led to success in some of the most significant corporate crime cases of this century and top rankings in international legal guides. He is recognised worldwide as one of the most capable legal experts regarding top-level, high-value commercial and financial disputes.

Share this page on