Rahman Ravelli
Rahman Ravelli Solicitors Logo
Rapid Response Team: 0800 559 3500
Switchboard: +44 (0)203 947 1539
 Request a Callback
Our Services Sectors International About Us Legal Articles News Contact Us
Rapid Response Team: 0800 559 3500
International: +44 (0)203 947 1539
Rapid Response Team: 0800 559 3500
International: +44 (0)203 947 1539
 

/ News / As investigations begin into fraud involving pandemic emergency loans, Neil Williams of financial crime specialists Rahman Ravelli assesses the challenge faced by the government.

As investigations begin into fraud involving pandemic emergency loans, Neil Williams of financial crime specialists Rahman Ravelli assesses the challenge faced by the government.



Authorities have started investigating allegations of fraud relating to the UK government’s coronavirus emergency loan schemes.

The investigations began after 11 cases were reported to Action Fraud, the UK’s national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime. Nine of the reports relate to suspected fraud involving the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS), with two concerning the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS).

Critics of the loan schemes have said they were vulnerable to exploitation because they were introduced with the aim of ensuring money reached businesses quickly and, as a result, led to only minimal checks being made on applicants.

BBLS involved the government providing lenders with a 100% guarantee for the loan and paying any fees and interest for the first year; with companies able to borrow between £2,000 and £50,000 or a maximum of 25% of annual turnover. The National Audit Office has said that BBLS-related fraud and defaulting on loans may cost the UK taxpayer between £15 billion and £26 billion; which is almost two-thirds of what the scheme paid out.

It is certainly true that the government has to ensure that robust procedures are in place for fraud investigation and debt collection. But given the huge amounts of finance that the government has felt compelled to use in order to prop up the economy, there are likely to be instances of money going to those who are not entitled to it.

Government departments simply did not have enough resources to adequately assess the legitimacy of all the applications in the timescale that was deemed necessary. Most will be legitimate but the lure of potentially low-risk easy money will be appealing to some.  The government had to manage the loosening of controls to allow the easy flow of funds while ensuring that significant amounts were not lost to fraud. How well they did this is likely to become clearer.

Neil Williams

Neil Williams

Legal Director

neil.williams@rahmanravelli.co.uk
+44 (0)203 910 4560 vCard

Specialist Areas of Practice: Fraud and Business Crime, Complex Crime, Corporate Investigations.

View Author Profile

London Office: +44 (0)203 947 1539
Midlands Office: +44 (0)121 827 7985
Northern Office: +44 (0)1422 346 666
24hr Rapid Response: 0800 559 3500


Need Help or Advice?

Share this article on