Rahman Ravelli assesses the likely impact of creating a wider range of failure to prevent offences

Proposals to create more 'failure to prevent' offences are gaining support as the UK considers how to address the issue of corporate criminal liability.

Introducing such offences is one of the options being considered by the Law Commission. With the idea supported by both the Serious Fraud Office and Crown Prosecution Service, Rahman Ravelli share their thoughts on the idea with Thomson Reuters’ Regulatory Intelligence.

Rahman Ravelli have explained that the need to reconsider corporate criminal liability has arisen because most modern companies are structured in a way that prevents any individual being able to act with no accountability to others.

They added that widening the range of offences for failure to prevent could lead to a rising number of larger corporations being prosecuted. Such offences do not require the prosecution to prove criminal intent on the part of an individual representing the 'directing mind' of the company, in order to establish corporate criminal liability.

But any such proposals will only become reality if there is the political will for the government to act on the Law Commission proposals and introduce the relevant legislation.

Rahman Ravelli's comments featured on Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence. (Subscription required) 

Featured at: Thomson Reuters