Rahman Ravelli
Rahman Ravelli Solicitors Logo
Call Our 24hr Rapid Response Team: 0800 559 3500  Request a Callback
Our Services Sectors International About Us Legal Articles News Contact Us
24hr Rapid Response: 0800 559 3500
24hr Rapid Response: 0800 559 3500
 

/ News / The Serious Fraud Office has produced a formal response to independent, in-depth assessments of how it functions.

The Serious Fraud Office has produced a formal response to independent, in-depth assessments of how it functions.



Neil Williams of business crime solicitors Rahman Ravelli considers the agency’s reaction to criticism of its working methods.

The UK’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has announced the action it may take in response to a detailed assessment of its leadership and case management. Hiring of paralegals to help review documents – and minimise the use of outside consultants - is one of the measures proposed by the SFO, following reports on its effectiveness by HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI). HMCPSI was given the task of conducting independent analysis of how the SFO works.

One HMCPSI report, released last July, said the SFO’s sharp focus on delivery of case work had led to a culture where neglectful approaches to management were tolerated. Another HMCPSI report, published last September, examined criticisms that SFO cases are often slow to progress; with some having been ongoing for more than seven years. Since arriving at the SFO as Director in 2018, Lisa Osofsky has closed a number of long-running investigations; including those into GlaxoSmithKline and individuals at Rolls-Royce.

The HMCPSI had highlighted the complexity and large amounts of evidence in SFO cases but said that the agency struggled to staff cases appropriately and process digital materials. It recommended that the SFO assess its available resources and devise new staffing models.

The SFO has said it accepts most of the HMCPSI recommendations. This indicates a general acceptance by it that changes need to be made in order to progress cases; with a particular focus on the support that should be provided to staff to help achieve their investigation goals. It is a surprise, however, that the SFO response only partly accepts the recommendations regarding case allocation; where cases are not being taken forward promptly after allocation. This is arguably a key issue to be addressed.

The SFO’s digital forensic unit, which has been described as being behind in its processing of material, also needs swift attention. The SFO’s wide-ranging search and seizure powers have perhaps been used abundantly, without consideration of the resources needed to process every item taken. A new digital strategy for each case would lead to a more streamlined approach to seizure powers, and so ease the burden further down the line.

Neil Williams

Neil Williams

Legal Director

neil.williams@rahmanravelli.co.uk
+44 (0)203 910 4560 vCard

Specialist Areas of Practice: Fraud and Business Crime, Complex Crime, Corporate Investigations.

View Author Profile

London Office: +44 (0)203 947 1539
Midlands Office: +44 (0)121 827 7985
Northern Office: +44 (0)1422 346 666
24hr Rapid Response: 0800 559 3500


Need Help or Advice?

Share this article on